They follow the king’s Pleasure.

Once upon a time, I could not fathom what it might be like to be a king, catered to on every point. I did not know what pleasure might mean for a king. To want things and have them delivered seemed so far out of my perceived experience. My cultural conditioning taught me to give pleasure, not receive it. Then, I would have said my only desire was to please others.

But now I know that that’s because I had not learned to recognize my own desires. It took purposeful attending to myself to learn my actual desires. Now I think I could even articulate some. I could call out orders like a king.

But even so – every so often I catch myself still catering to the kings instead of being one.

I am constant to my purpose.

I am, too, Hamlet. I am too.

I think of my purpose as a thin red string that I follow through all manner of places and weathers and environments and conditions but I never lose sight of it.

I used to think it was leading me somewhere – either as punishment or reward – but now, I recognize that it is the following that is the point.

It’s not being led – it’s staying true to ones own purpose, one’s compass, one’s truth.

I’ve sacrificed many things to stay true to that.

He sends to know if your pleasure hold to Play with Laertes, or that you will take longer time.

Mmmm. “Play” with Laertes. Sure. It’s a game. Sure. I mean – it’s a particularly misleading way to talk about a fight. Like – if it were a boxing match and someone came in to ask you if you were ready to PLAY with Mike Tyson. Uh. It’s a fight, right? A match? A sparring?

We use “play” in the context of contests like chess – which are also matches – but when swords are involved, can we rightly call it play? Unless you’re eight and you’re using toy swords, it seems like a stretch.

My lord, his majesty commended him to you by young Osric, who brings back to him that you attend him in The hall:

It’s interesting that this random Lord makes a point of calling Osric “young.” Osric doesn’t seem young and maybe he isn’t. It’s possible that this lord is very old and everyone is young to him – though it doesn’t seem nice to send an old man to do your errands.

Why does the king send this guy instead?

It’s possible, of course, that Osric has been flustered by the exchange with Hamlet – but I doubt he’d have the authority to unselect himself for the message delivery job. It’s the king’s choice to send Osric and then not send him. It’s the king’s choice to send “lord” who describes Osric as “young.” Why?

a kind of Yesty collection, which carries them through and Through the most fond and winnowed opinions, and do But blow them to their trial, the bubbles are out.

Yesty is interesting. It would seem to be connected to Yeasty – which I suppose calls to mind a self-expanding substance that pushes itself into any empty space. But Yesty has a big YES in it as in a Yes Man saying yes no matter what is presented to him, which also rather neatly represents Osric. He is both Yeasty and Yesty. Yessy?

I wasn’t clear what the bubbles were doing in this line at first – but then I thought some more about yeast and realized that when yeast is at work, it does create bubbles. Rising dough is full of bubbles. That’s why you knead dough, to bring it all back down to earth by bursting the bubbles.

Thus has he – and many More of the same bevy that I know the dressy age dotes on – only got the tune of The time and outward habit of encounter.

This line makes me wonder if Osric might be on the autism spectrum. Or rather this description of Osric reminds me of what I’ve come to understand is a coping mechanism for neurodivergent people, particularly those on the spectrum. If you can’t quite read people or loud social encounters intuitively – then learning a few outward expressions is a great way to survive.

He did comply with his dug, before he sucked it.

I mean. Would this be so bad? Can you imagine a baby so considerate that he considered the feelings of his mother’s nipple? I mean – this feels like a whole different issue than his behavior with Hamlet.

Like, baby Osric checking in with his mom, like, “Dear Mother, would you mind very much if I fed from your breast now?”

Whereas Osric’s real issue is that he embroiders the facts and is socially awkward in building up the wrong people in status sensitive situations.
I can’t help feeling that this line rather reverberates with misogyny. I mean, the mother’s nipple is entirely disembodied and belongs to her son.

This lapwing runs away with the shell on his head.

I suppose, since I never played Horatio, I never had cause to look up what a lapwing was and so my initial guess stuck with me, despite it being entirely wrong.

A lapwing is a bird. It is the kind of bird that wades. Apparently there was a notion that lapwings would retain a bit of shell on their heads after breaking through. You know what it’s not? A snail. It is 100% not a snail. It is not a running snail. That’s what I thought a lapwing was. But I was so wrong.

He does well to commend it himself, there are no Tongues else for’s turn.

It would be a little bit sad if there were not one single person to speak well of him. There are many truly terrible people in the world and they usually have someone to commend them.

I would have thought no one in the world could commend Trump – but, in fact, there are thousands, maybe millions who do. I mean – to me, he seems one of the most odious human beings I have ever seen. I heard his voice this morning while brushing my teeth and I almost threw up, my gag response was so strong.

But there are many to praise him.

Likewise, Osric may be a suck-up or a lapwing or waterfly – but I would be surprised if he didn’t have a whole crew of people to commend him. There’s always someone, I think.