It would be funny if you could bring in a god – like for court or something.
Like, say, put him on trail for that tsunami or earthquake. They call him as a witness. He takes the 5th. Submits to the court.
Until he tires of the proceedings and just goes ahead and sends a tornado to carry the courthouse into the ocean.
This is one of those words that makes contemporary kids crack up. Whenever it shows up in the plays, they fall about laughing.
To them “Ho” means “whore.” And a very particular brand of whore, no less.
What they almost never realize is how many actual references to whores there are in the plays. These accidental whorish moments are hilarious to them – meanwhile the actual whore jokes sail right on past.
But I am not the sort to make sure they get them. I might be the sort to suggest that there are many references like this in a scene and send the students in search of them. It’s always more fun as a discovery. May I never be that creepy teacher who’s like, “This is a sexual allusion, kids. Get it? Get it? Let me explain it.”
I would like to see the scene outside the door. I would like to see Hamlet with the guards. I picture the guards like the ones at Buckingham Palace and Hamlet just cutting up with them. Maybe playing a little game of “There’s something on your shirt” or doing a little antic dance. I feel like this would be a great moment for Hamlet the Clown.
I love the inversion in this line. It’s like – you’d think you’d SAVE the words “dead body” for the end of the sentence…that if you’re working yourself up to a difficult bit of language, that “dead body” would be at the end. As in “We cannot get from him where the dead body is bestowed, my lord.” Or even better, “My lord, we cannot get from him where he has bestowed the dead body.” That’s how most of us would phrase information like this… we’d save the dead body, a thing we don’t like to discuss, for the end. But for Rosencrantz, he leads with the dead body and is saving for the end, instead, his own failure.
Rosencrantz is such a tool, isn’t he? He sounds like some sort of uptight school boy trying to get one of his fellow students to follow the rules. I bet, if Rosencrantz and Guildenstern went to boarding school, that Rosencrantz was a head boy or prefect or whatever you call a rule following, rule enforcing pain in the ass kind of kid. I don’t know. All of my knowledge of boarding school comes from books. Dickens, Fry, Rowling. But. This line in particular makes me picture Rosencrantz as a kid in a uniform with his hair all organized and his handkerchief placed perfectly in his pocket.
Poor Rosencrantz. Does he really not understand or is he pretending not to understand?
If he doesn’t understand wouldn’t it have been wiser to ask exactly what Hamlet means? And if Hamlet had broken it down for him a bit, would he reconsider his position as resident toady for the King?
I mean, with Polonius gone, there’s no other obvious choice for company toady. Rosencrantz may be angling for the spying, sucking up position. And, of course, ends up dead. Osric steps in to the position later – and he lives, it would seem. One of the few to survive the play.
I’d start with art. That’s my favorite thing to believe.
Love is a good one, too. Also, equality.
Pleasure. Ease. Kindness.
These are good to believe.
They’re really outing themselves now. They’re not even trying to pretend that they’re there as Hamlet’s friends. This line makes it crystal clear where their alliance lies.
1) They know about the dead body. And they’re coming after Hamlet for it.
2) They have the job of carrying the dead body to the chapel. This is not work you give your step-son’s friends. This is work you give to your cronies. Plain and simple. What’s that line about how a good friend will help you move but the best friends will help you move a body?
I’ve done some work with a program in which students use Shakespeare as found text. They’re constantly searching for lines that could apply to their new (invented) circumstances. Most recently, I had a group creating a kidnapping scene and another creating a Black Lives Matter protest show. It is not easy to fold one thing into the other.
I feel like this line would be a great one for one of those sorts of dramatic devised scenes. I can imagine a group just developing a whole new scene with only this line as a prompt. It would be a different way to start – but a very interesting one.
Probably what they should have said FIRST. Probably didn’t need to speechify about a bunch of kingly things. Probably should have said, “Yes, sir. We’ll go to England as you asked. Thank you very much. We will haste us, goodbye.”
But. . .it takes all kinds. And it can take time for people to get a hint. Like, the people who just won’t hang up or who won’t leave or who won’t let you leave. Maybe Rosencrantz is one of THOSE.