But thou wouldst not think how ill all’s here About my heart:

What a day for this line to appear!

I am all twisted up with a sense of foreboding, two varieties of sudden stress – heat and a heart that is fluttering like a curtain in a hurricane.

I’m not about to face a sword fight that will lead to my death but my system is acting like it is.

All I’m doing is going into a day of rehearsal. That is all. But all these years of roller coastering emotionally whenever I do this have lead to this day featuring the same all ill feeling about my heart that I get every time I do this.

Why do I do it?

I ask myself this question every time as well.

It’s not that I forget that this happens. I know.

It’s just that I convince myself that it’s worth it. I’m not sure it is.

But whatever inspiration makes this happen feels stronger than all of it when it begins. Inspiration beats all the other things. At least so far.

*

And again, what a day for this line to appear as I got to post it into the website, two years later. It’s inauguration day as of midnight and the hope is only just barely making its way through the fear and anxiety that something, anything, will go wrong. But it must be alright. It has to be alright. Is that hope? I think so. My fingers are crossed double hard.

I shall win at the Odds.

These are the kind of odds I could win at, too – the kind where I don’t exactly win, just don’t entirely lose. Those are the kind of odds wherein I get a few choice hits in and we call that success.

If feels like that’s what aging as an artist means – figuring out what our odds are that allow us to redefine success. Once you know what the winnable odds are – then you can play THAT game.

Since he went into France, I Have been in continual practice.

The Genius note expressed some skepticism about the veracity of this claim. Certainly, we haven’t SEEN Hamlet continually at fencing practice. But that doesn’t mean he’s not getting some practice in.

I mean, he’s preparing to revenge his father’s death by killing Claudius. What other kinds of preparation for murder might there be?

And when he does get the opportunity, he hits Claudius with just one blow – so he’s got some muscle memory in this department.

If I had plans to kill someone, even if I didn’t plan to murder them with a rapier and dagger, I might find rapier and dagger practice useful – just to get me going.

I do not think so.

I feel like it’s easy to think Hamlet is being uncharacteristically optimistic here. He thinks he’s going to win this?

But – he’s not saying he’s going to win the sword fight. He’s going to win at the odds – that is, the wager that Claudius has is that he’s not going to lose entirely – that he’ll get a few hits in. Which he does. Sort of.

It is a funny wager though – I bet you’re only going to lose a LITTLE bit.

You will lose this wager, my lord.

Maybe it’s lines like this that make people feel that Horatio is close to Hamlet. After all, who but your closest friend would tell you this kind of truth? But – if we look a little closer, we see that Horatio is speaking to Hamlet in a very formal manner. He’s calling him “you” not “thou” and calling him “my lord” – not “my friend.” Granted, Hamlet is a prince and there aren’t many who could or should risk getting informal with him. Horatio switches to the thou form once Hamlet’s dead.

Of course, Horatio also attempts to poison himself once it becomes clear that Hamlet’s on his way out the door – so that suggests a strong bond, for sure.

Though, it may be self preservation – to be the only one left living in a total bloodbath does rather make one look a bit…guilty.

I’m not saying that’s why Horatio brings up his antique Roman tendencies but it may be out of something apart from friendship – and he could have switched to something a bit less formal here if he’d wanted to, even if he kept using you. He could have called Hamlet something more affectionate than “my lord.” Though, perhaps the formality allows truth to be spoken.

She well instructs me.

I keep thinking about Theresa Rebeck’s play about Sarah Bernhardt playing Hamlet. I did not much like this play but I occasionally consider a recurring idea in it wherein the character of Sarah Bernhardt is convinced Hamlet is, like, 19 and not 33 as is customarily assumed. I don’t know whether that was actually Bernhardt’s take or whether that’s Rebeck’s – but it is an interesting notion. I’m inclined to go with what the text suggests in the gravediggers scene because I’m a text junkie. But a case can be made for a teenage Hamlet. He’s at University. He’s not King. He’s not married. He’s under his parent’s thumb.

But this line leans me toward an older Hamlet. A teen might respond to this request from his mom with annoyance and frustration. He might say, “Gawd! She is so annoying. I was ALREADY going to do that! I was just SAYING that. Come on!”

But he doesn’t. He says, “She well instructs me.” – which feels like something only an older son could say.

The queen desires you to use some gentle Entertainment to Laertes before you fall to play.

What DOES the Queen mean here? She surely doesn’t mean a recitation of poetry or some light soft rock playing.

If Hamlet’s actual actions in the scene have met her request, it’s some light banter and a heartfelt apology.

I think it’s probably an exchanging of niceties, really. 

Why does a grown man need to be suggested such a thing via a third party? And not even a third party with a name.

It’s a little bit patronizing.

But it also makes me wonder if there’s some coded messaging that might happen between mother and son in such a codified environment. These two haven’t talked since they discussed Hamlet Senior’s murder. They haven’t even had a chat since Ophelia died and Hamlet tried to leap into her grave.

Is this instruction as patronizing as it seems or does it contain some message? Or did it contain a message that the lord has observed in his reporting of it?

Probably it’s just a motherly suggestion of being nice to your opponent before you try to kill him with a sword – but maybe there’s more!

In happy time.

I would love it if folks who worked in service started to use this. Like, if you asked for an extra spoon at a restaurant, the server could say “In happy time.” And the good thing about it would be that they could mean it sarcastically without it sounding so necessarily – so it could stand for a kind of cushion of time. It could SOUND like “right away, sir” but could MEAN “just as soon as I get around to it and it might be a while.”

Because happy time is likely to mean different things to different parties.

The king and queen and all are coming down.

Where are we now and where are the king, queen and all?

It would seem, since they are “coming down” that they are upstairs and this hall is down. Is there an upstairs throne room and a downstairs fencing hall? What is the architecture of Elsinore? I have a lot of questions about it.

Which spaces are private, which are public, how big the rooms are, what the casements are like…is there a literary architecture department somewhere that has studied this?

Of course, the lord could just mean “coming down” in the sense of “coming down the hall.” That’s also an option.

If his fitness speaks, mine is ready; now Or whensoever, provided I be so able as now.

The journey of “fitness” from a quality of being suitable, to the ideal physicality of the body is very interesting to me.

“Fitness” as we use it today first came in to play in the 30s and you know, I’m a little uncomfortable about that timing. Fitness as an ideal physicality is a little close to the Nazi ideals of supermen and perfection – genetic superiority and such.

The word once meant something akin to appropriateness and the fact that we shifted that idea to bodies is a little disturbing. In the ever striving for “physical fitness,” so many strive for an unattainable ideal instead of, just, like, being able to do stuff.

Fitness conjures images of women with no fat on their bodies in pastel leotards and shiny tights.

My training in Feldenkrais leads me toward words that have more possibility. Instead of physical fitness – I’m interested in physical readiness – physical potentiality. The more stuff you can do, the more potential for movement you have, the more choice.

It’s not: Can you join the army of genetically identical warriors? But – Can you learn to do a somersault with a child if you want? That’s readiness. The readiness is all.